Consensus mechanisms play a crucial role in verifying the legitimacy of blockchain networks by fostering trust, security, and agreement among network participants. In this approach, all nodes in a decentralized network must agree on the state of a blockchain.
Blockchains traditionally incorporated Proof of Stake (POS) and Proof of Work (POW). To increase security, Bitcoin, for example, uses the POW mechanism to pay miners to solve computational puzzles. On the other hand, Ethereum compensates participants with native tokens based on their stake levels.
Nevertheless, Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) serves as a solution to address inefficiencies that previous methods could not adequately resolve. So, what exactly is DPoS? In this article, we’ll explore what DPoS is, how it works, and more.
Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 15 (Sept 9 – Dec 7, 2024) has started registrations; register today for early bird discounts.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations here.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and invest in Africa’s finest startups here.
What is Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS)?
Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) offers an alternative to the POS consensus algorithm. In DPoS, network participants elect delegates or validators responsible for creating and validating blocks. Afterward, supporters or voters of these delegates can then receive rewards from them.
Background of DPoS
One of the first projects to employ Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) to increase blockchain performance was BitShares, a blockchain platform developed by Daniel Larimer in 2015. Due to its early success, DPoS proved to be a feasible solution for other blockchain projects by demonstrating its ability to manage large transaction volumes.
After BitShares, DPoS was used in several other projects. Notable projects include the well-known blockchain network, EOS, and the social media site, Steem. EOS attracted lots of interest for both its large-scale initial coin offering (ICO) and its application of DPoS. Therefore, illustrated the potential utility of DPoS for extensive blockchain applications.
How Does Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) Work?
In DPoS, voting is combined with a simplified block-creation process. It allows token holders to elect a few delegates who are responsible for validating transactions and creating new blocks.
In order to select these delates, users pool their tokens into a staking pool, and the delegate with the most tokens may help to validate a block. However, the number of tokens a user has helps to determine their ability to vote. This means that the more tokens they own, the more power they have.
Moreover, voters and other delegates keep an eye on the elected delegates as they alternately propose and validate blocks. In order to guarantee its legitimacy, a block proposal needs to be approved by the majority of delegates. Unlike conventional consensus methods, this procedure improves the network’s scalability and efficiency.
In addition, delegates can be regularly replaced in DPoS elections according to their reputation and performance. This retains only reliable delegates in positions of authority. Occasionally, delegates and users who voted for them receive rewards such as transaction fees. This encourages delegates to perform efficiently, while voters are motivated to select delegates who best represent their interests.
Proof of Stake (PoS) vs Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS)
Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) and Proof of Stake (PoS) are both consensus mechanisms designed to enhance the efficiency and scalability of blockchain networks. However, they differ significantly in their approach and execution.
In PoS, all stakeholders with a stake in the network participate directly in the validation process. This model relies on the amount of cryptocurrency held by each participant to determine their influence. Although PoS offers advantages like computational power, lower energy consumption, and quicker transaction processing than Proof of Work (PoW), it can also lead to centralization, as those with larger stakes wield more control and accumulate block rewards disproportionately.
However, DPoS introduces a democratic process for block verification by allowing token holders to vote for a limited number of delegates responsible for transaction validation. This system addresses some PoS’s drawbacks by distributing the validation power more evenly among elected representatives or block producers, rather than concentrating it among wealthy stakeholders. Consequently, DPoS often results in higher transaction throughput and improved scalability, as the number of active validators is reduced, making the consensus process more efficient and less prone to centralization issues in PoS.
Nominated Proof of Stake (NPoS) vs Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS)
While Proof of Stake (Pos) and Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) differ significantly, DPoS and Nominated Proof of Stake (NPoS) have a minor overlap. However, they differ in some aspects.
Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) and Nominated Proof of Stake (NPoS) both use voting for blockchain validation but with key differences. In NPoS used by Polkadot and Kusama, both nominators and validators are fully involved in the staking system. Nominators vote for validators, and both parties must stake tokens. If either nominators or validators act maliciously, they can face penalties.
Conversely, DPoS allows users known as delegators to vote for validators or delegates who handle block creation and verification. These validators are held accountable for any issues, while delegators are not directly penalized.
Advantages of Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS)
DPoS differs from other conventional consensus methods due to its unique framework and contributions to the blockchain. Below are some of the advantages of DPoS.
Guarantees Efficiency and Scalability
DPoS accelerates block confirmation times and supports higher transaction throughput by limiting the number of delegates responsible for validating transactions. This approach contrasts sharply with more energy-intensive consensus mechanisms like Proof of Work (PoW) thereby, contributing to blockchain scalability and efficiency.
Enhances Inclusivity and Decentralization
DPoS lowers entry barriers by allowing any token holder to participate in the voting process and potentially become a delegate. This fosters a more democratic governance model and encourages broader community involvement. Therefore, enhancing the network’s resilience through regular delegate elections and accountability.
Ensure Rapid Network Upgrades
DPoS supports rapid network upgrades and adjustments without requiring disruptive hard forks. Its predictable block production and community-driven decision-making contribute to a robust and adaptable blockchain ecosystem.
Disadvantages of Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS)
While DPoS offers several benefits to blockchain, there are certain limitations. Below are some of the associated risks of DPoS.
Risk of Centralization
A primary concern is the risk of centralization, where a limited number of delegates might concentrate power, undermining the decentralized nature of the network. This can potentially lead to vulnerabilities such as collusion and reduced network security.
Dependence on Voter Participation
The system also relies heavily on active voter participation. If stakeholders are disengaged or uninformed, it can result in the election of ineffective or malicious delegates, compromising the integrity of the network. Also, the need for constant user engagement in voting and awareness can be a significant barrier for some users.
Favoring Wealthier Token Holders
DPoS networks may inadvertently favor those with greater token holdings, giving them more influence in delegate elections and potentially skewing governance. This can marginalize smaller stakeholders and exacerbate inequalities.
Financial Barriers to Delegates
Becoming a delegate in a DPoS network often requires substantial financial resources and infrastructure, making it difficult for average users to participate. This financial barrier can limit the diversity of candidates and increase the cost of network participation.
Frequently Answered Questions
Below are some of the frequently answered questions
What is the Difference Between Stake and Delegate?
Staking is the process of locking cryptocurrency in a network to serve as transaction collateral, while delegation means entrusting the process to validators to ensure network security.
What is The Purpose of a Delegated Validator in a Proof Stake Blockchain?
A delegated validator in a proof-of-stake blockchain helps to validate transactions and secure the network. They are selected by token holders who delegate their voting power or stake to them. This system helps ensure network security and efficiency while allowing token holders to participate in governance without directly validating transactions.
What Blockchains use Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS)?
EOS and Steem are popular blockchains that enhanced the growth of DPoS. Additionally, it is also implemented on other notable networks which include; SUI, Tron (TRX), Hive, Elastos, Credits, and Ark.
Does Delegated Proof of Stake Work Like Leased Proof of Stake?
While network participants elect representatives also known as delegates or witnesses to stake their crypto in DPoS, Leased Proof of Stake allows these participants to lease their cryptocurrency to network nodes.
Conclusion
Delegated Proof of Stake (DPoS) offers an advanced blockchain consensus approach, improving the traditional Proof of Stake (PoS) method. DPoS enhances efficiency and scalability by using a system where token holders vote to elect delegates who validate transactions. This method speeds up transaction processing and lowers energy use, making it an environmentally friendly option compared to PoW. It also fosters inclusivity and adaptability within the network.
However, DPoS has its challenges such as centralization of power among a few delegates, dependence on active voter participation, potential bias towards wealthier holders and even its financial barriers to becoming a delegate can limit participation diversity. Nevertheless, DPoS presents a promising solution for improving blockchain performance and addressing the drawbacks of earlier consensus models.