Reports indicate that a USAID memo, as cited by outlets like Wired and Crypto News, reveals the Trump administration’s plans to integrate blockchain technology into the U.S. Agency for International Development’s (USAID) payment and procurement systems. The proposal aims to enhance security, transparency, and traceability in aid distributions by leveraging blockchain to track funds and enforce outcome-based payment models, rather than traditional input-focused approaches.
The memo suggests this could encourage innovation and efficiency among implementing partners. However, it remains unclear whether this would involve cryptocurrencies, stablecoins, or simply a blockchain ledger, and specifics on implementation are still vague. This move aligns with broader discussions within the administration about modernizing foreign aid distribution. Blockchain operates as a decentralized ledger where every transaction is recorded publicly (or within a permissioned network) and is visible to all authorized participants.
This reduces opacity, making it easier to track funds or assets from origin to destination—ideal for ensuring aid reaches intended recipients. Data on a blockchain is encrypted and linked in a chain of blocks, where each block references the previous one. Altering a single record requires changing all subsequent blocks, which is computationally impractical, especially on large networks. This tamper-resistance protects against fraud and unauthorized changes.
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 17 (June 9 – Sept 6, 2025) today for early bird discounts. Do annual for access to Blucera.com.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register to become a better CEO or Director with Tekedia CEO & Director Program.
Once a transaction is recorded and validated, it can’t be erased or modified without consensus from the network. This creates a reliable audit trail, crucial for accountability in systems like aid distribution where funds often pass through multiple hands. By cutting out intermediaries—like banks or clearinghouses—blockchain can streamline processes. Payments or contracts (via smart contracts, self-executing code on the blockchain) can settle faster and cheaper, reducing administrative overhead and delays.
Every transaction is time-stamped and linked to a unique identifier, allowing precise tracking of resources. For USAID, this could mean verifying that funds hit specific milestones (e.g., vaccines delivered) before releasing further payments, aligning with outcome-based models. In environments with low institutional trust, blockchain’s decentralized nature means no single party controls the system. Participants can rely on the technology itself, rather than a central authority, which could be a game-changer for aid in conflict zones or corrupt systems.
Over time, eliminating manual reconciliation, paperwork, and third-party fees can lower operational costs. For a large organization like USAID, even small savings per transaction could add up significantly. That said, it’s not flawless—blockchain can be energy-intensive (depending on the consensus mechanism, like proof-of-work in Bitcoin), complex to implement, and requires tech literacy to manage effectively. Still, for something like aid payments, where fraud and inefficiency are perennial headaches, the benefits could outweigh the hurdles if executed well.
The Trump administration has pivoted toward a crypto-friendly framework. An executive order in January 2025 established a working group to draft new regulations and explore a national digital asset stockpile from seized cryptocurrencies. The U.S. has also repealed stringent IRS DeFi broker rules and paused SEC enforcement actions, signaling a lighter regulatory touch. Stablecoin legislation is gaining traction, with bills like the Clarity for Payment Stablecoins Act under consideration, though a retail central bank digital currency (CBDC) has been ruled out.