A credit rating is an assessment of the creditworthiness of a borrower, such as a government, a corporation, or an individual. It reflects the likelihood that the borrower will repay its debt obligations on time and in full. Credit ratings are assigned by independent agencies, such as Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s, and Fitch, based on various factors, such as the borrower’s financial strength, economic outlook, political stability, and debt burden.
A credit rating downgrade is a negative change in the credit rating of a borrower, indicating that the borrower’s credit risk has increased. A downgrade can have significant implications for the borrower’s borrowing costs, as well as its access to capital markets. In this blog post, we will discuss how a credit rating downgrade affects the borrowing costs of different types of borrowers, and what strategies they can adopt to mitigate the impact.
Borrowing costs refer to the interest rate or yield that a borrower has to pay to borrow money from lenders or investors. Borrowing costs depend on various factors, such as the supply and demand of credit, the inflation expectations, the monetary policy, and the credit risk premium.
Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 16 (Feb 10 – May 3, 2025) opens registrations; register today for early bird discounts.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations here.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and invest in Africa’s finest startups here.
The credit risk premium is the additional return that lenders or investors require to lend or invest in a risky borrower, compared to a risk-free borrower. The credit risk premium is influenced by the credit rating of the borrower, as well as other market conditions.
A credit rating downgrade increases the credit risk premium of the borrower, which in turn increases its borrowing costs. The magnitude of the increase depends on several factors, such as the severity of the downgrade, the initial credit rating level, the type of debt instrument, and the market sentiment. Generally speaking, the lower the initial credit rating level, the higher the sensitivity to a downgrade.
For example, a downgrade from AAA to AA+ may have a smaller impact than a downgrade from BBB- to BB+, which crosses the threshold from investment grade to speculative grade. Similarly, the longer the maturity of the debt instrument, the higher the sensitivity to a downgrade. For example, a downgrade may have a larger impact on a 10-year bond than on a 3-month bill.
The impact of a credit rating downgrade also varies across different types of borrowers. For sovereign borrowers, such as governments, a downgrade can increase their borrowing costs both domestically and internationally. A higher borrowing cost can worsen their fiscal position and debt sustainability and may trigger further downgrades or even default.
A sovereign downgrade can also have spillover effects on other borrowers within the same country, such as banks, corporations, and households, as they may face higher borrowing costs due to their perceived linkage with the sovereign risk. For example, during the European debt crisis in 2010-2012, several countries in the eurozone experienced sovereign downgrades that led to higher borrowing costs for their banks and corporations.
For corporate borrowers, such as companies, a downgrade can increase their borrowing costs both from banks and from bond markets. A higher borrowing cost can reduce their profitability and cash flow, and may affect their ability to invest, grow, or repay their debts.
A corporate downgrade can also have spillover effects on other borrowers within the same industry or sector, as they may face higher borrowing costs due to their perceived correlation with the industry or sector risk. For example, during the global financial crisis in 2008-2009, several financial institutions experienced corporate downgrades that led to higher borrowing costs for other financial institutions.
For individual borrowers, such as consumers or households, a downgrade can increase their borrowing costs both from banks and from non-bank lenders. A higher borrowing cost can reduce their disposable income and consumption spending and may affect their ability to service their mortgages or other debts.
An individual downgrade can also have spillover effects on other borrowers within the same community or region, as they may face higher borrowing costs due to their perceived association with the community or region risk. For example, during the subprime mortgage crisis in 2007-2008, several homeowners experienced individual downgrades that led to higher borrowing costs for other homeowners.
The adoption and legitimacy of Bitcoin
Bitcoin is a decentralized digital currency that operates without the need for a central authority or intermediary. It was created in 2009 by an anonymous person or group using the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. Bitcoin uses a peer-to-peer network to verify transactions and secure the network from malicious attacks. Bitcoin transactions are recorded in a public ledger called the blockchain, which ensures transparency and accountability.
Bitcoin has been gaining popularity and acceptance as a form of payment and investment in recent years. According to CoinMarketCap, as of November 18, 2023, there are over 21 million bitcoins in circulation, with a market capitalization of over $1.2 trillion. Bitcoin is accepted by thousands of merchants and service providers worldwide, including major companies like Microsoft, PayPal, Starbucks, and Tesla. Bitcoin is also recognized as a legal tender in some countries, such as El Salvador, Japan, and Switzerland.
One of the main advantages of Bitcoin is that it is immune to inflation and debt. Unlike fiat currencies, which are controlled by governments and central banks, Bitcoin has a fixed supply of 21 million units that will ever be created. This means that no one can manipulate the value of Bitcoin by printing more money or creating artificial scarcity. Bitcoin also has a transparent and predictable issuance rate, which is determined by an algorithm and decreases over time until the final bitcoin is mined around the year 2140.
Bitcoin can also help people escape from debt and financial repression. Many countries around the world suffer from high levels of debt, either public or private, that are unsustainable and burden future generations. Some governments resort to measures such as currency devaluation, capital controls, bailouts, or confiscation of assets to deal with their debt problems, but these often harm the ordinary citizens and erode their purchasing power and savings.
Bitcoin, on the other hand, offers a way for people to store and transfer value that is independent of any government or institution, and that cannot be seized or censored. Bitcoin users can also benefit from lower transaction fees, faster settlement times, and greater financial inclusion than traditional payment systems.
Therefore, Bitcoin can be seen as a legitimate alternative to fiat currencies, especially in times of economic turmoil and uncertainty. Bitcoin offers a sound and scarce form of money that is resistant to inflation and debt, and that empowers individuals to control their own finances. Bitcoin also has the potential to foster innovation and competition in the global financial system, and to challenge the status quo of centralization and corruption.