In a joint announcement on Sunday, the military-led governments of Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso have declared their decision to withdraw from the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), a regional economic bloc that has played a crucial role in fostering cooperation and integration among member nations.
The move, while not entirely unexpected given the threats made by these countries last year to resist ECOWAS by all means, raises questions about the future of regional stability and the impact of the military juntas’ departure on the broader West African community.
The three nations, all currently under some level of sanctions due to military takeovers that ousted democratic governments, cited the perceived failure of ECOWAS to support them in their fight against terrorism and insecurity as a primary reason for their exit. The military leaders argue that their focus is on restoring security within their borders before returning to constitutional rule, emphasizing the need to address insurgencies linked to groups such as al Qaeda and the Islamic State.
Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 16 (Feb 10 – May 3, 2025) opens registrations; register today for early bird discounts.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations here.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and invest in Africa’s finest startups here.
Colonel Amadou Abdramane, the spokesperson for the Niger junta, expressed the disappointment of the three nations in a statement, stating, “After 49 years, the valiant peoples of Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger regretfully and with great disappointment observe that the (ECOWAS) organization has drifted from the ideals of its founding fathers and the spirit of Pan-Africanism.”
“The organization notably failed to assist these states in their existential fight against terrorism and insecurity,” the statement added.
The implications bear weighty impacts
The decision to withdraw from ECOWAS underpins a significant setback for the regional bloc’s efforts towards integration and collective security. ECOWAS had suspended the three countries following the military coups, attempting to use sanctions and diplomatic pressure to push for a return to constitutional rule. However, despite negotiations and threats of military intervention, the military leaders have remained defiant, accusing ECOWAS of being influenced by external powers.
One of the critical consequences of this withdrawal is the uncertainty surrounding the impact on the free movement of goods and citizens within the 15-member regional bloc. ECOWAS has long been a proponent of economic integration, allowing for the unrestricted flow of goods and people across member states. The departure of Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso could disrupt this established system and potentially lead to economic challenges for the remaining member nations.
Although according to ECOWAS’s treaty, member states seeking to withdraw must provide a written one-year notice, the three nations said their exit from the bloc takes immediate effect. The treaty stipulates that withdrawing states must continue to abide by its provisions during the one-year notice period, further complicating the immediate implications of the exit.
In a statement on Sunday, ECOWAS said it is yet to be informed by the three countries of their decision to quit the bloc, and that it is “working assiduously with these countries for the restoration of constitutional order.” The bloc added that “Burkina Faso, Niger, and Mali remain important members of the Community and the Authority remains committed to finding a negotiated solution to the political impasse”.
“The ECOWAS Commission remains seized with the development and shall make further pronouncements as the situation evolves,” the statement added.
The situation is further complicated by the fact that the three departing nations are also members of the West African Monetary Union (UEMOA), consisting of eight countries that use the West African CFA franc currency pegged to the Euro. The monetary union, responding to the coups in Mali and Niger, had initially severed their access to the regional financial market and the regional central bank. Although Mali’s access has been restored, Niger remains suspended, grappling with the resulting economic consequences.
The decision by Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso to sever ties with ECOWAS also extends beyond regional politics. The nations have cut military and cooperation ties with their former colonial master, France, and have turned to Russia for security support. This geopolitical shift could have broader implications for the balance of power in the region and may lead to new alliances and partnerships.
As the situation unravels, Nigeria and other ECOWAS member states are expected to respond swiftly to contain further escalation. Under the leadership of Nigerian President Bola Tinubu, ECOWAS was on the brink of military intervention in Niger, but public outcry, particularly from Nigeriens holding large rallies in support of the junta, stymied the move. Nigerians also strongly opposed military intervention in neighboring Niger, citing concerns about exacerbating the already precarious security situation in northern Nigeria, among other reasons.
The implications of the decision by Niger, Mali, and Burkina Faso to exit ECOWAS, marks a pivotal moment in the region’s politics, as they extend beyond diplomatic relations, affecting economic integration, security cooperation, and the geopolitical alignment of West African nations.
Sanctions, threats of military action, and dialogue – strategies deployed earlier by ECOWAS, failed to compel the coupists to reconsider their decisions. It is now unclear what further step the bloc will take to salvage the regional unity and stability that it has sought to foster for nearly five decades.