Saudi Aramco CEO Amin Nasser delivered a bold declaration challenging the widely discussed notion of phasing out fossil fuels during a panel interview at the CERAWeek by S&P Global energy conference in Houston, Texas.
Nasser criticized the current energy transition strategy, labeling it as a failing endeavor that clashes with the stark realities of global energy demand.
“In the real world, the current transition strategy is visibly failing on most fronts as it collides with five hard realities,” Nasser stated during the panel discussion.
Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 16 (Feb 10 – May 3, 2025) opens registrations; register today for early bird discounts.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations here.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and invest in Africa’s finest startups here.
He advocated for a reset in the transition strategy, proposing an abandonment of the “fantasy” of phasing out oil and gas in favor of realistic investment reflecting ongoing demand. Nasser’s proposition received applause from the audience, signaling resonance with some sectors of the energy industry.
Nasser countered the International Energy Agency’s forecast of peak oil, gas, and coal demand by 2030, asserting that demand is not likely to peak soon, especially when considering the developing world. He emphasized the need for the IEA to broaden its focus beyond the U.S. and Europe to encompass the burgeoning energy demands of developing nations.
“The transition strategy reset is urgently needed and my proposal is this: We should abandon the fantasy of phasing out oil and gas and instead invest in them adequately reflecting realistic demand assumptions,” the CEO.
The CEO presented compelling statistics, highlighting the persistent dominance of hydrocarbons in the global energy mix despite substantial investments in alternative energy sources. He pointed out the limited scale of wind, solar, and electric vehicles, juxtaposing them against the continued growth of hydrocarbons.
“Alternative energy sources have been unable to displace hydrocarbons at scale, despite the world investing more than $9.5 trillion over the past two decades,” Nasser remarked. “Wind and solar currently supply less than 4% of the world’s energy, while total electric vehicle penetration is less than 3%.”
Moreover, Nasser stressed the pivotal role of gas in reducing carbon emissions, particularly through the transition from coal to gas. He challenged the prevailing narrative of fossil fuels’ declining significance, citing their indispensable role in ensuring energy security.
“This is hardly the future picture some have been painting,” Nasser noted. “Even they are starting to acknowledge the importance of oil and gas security.”
Addressing the United Nations COP28 climate talks in Dubai last December, Nasser’s sentiments echoed broader skepticism towards a swift phase-out of fossil fuels. While delegates hailed a historic climate deal, Nasser’s stance aligns with over 100 nations advocating against a complete phase-out, citing concerns over sustainable development.
Sultan al-Jaber, the COP28 President, echoed Nasser’s sentiments, asserting that no scientific evidence necessitates a fossil fuel phase-out to limit global heating to 1.5°C. Al Jaber cautioned against jeopardizing sustainable development, supporting the belief shared by oil-producing nations, including Saudi Arabia.
At the same time, delegates at the United Nations COP28 climate talks in Dubai agreed to a deal that would, for the first time, push nations to transition away from fossil fuels to avert the worst effects of climate change.
Al-Jaber hailed the deal, approved by almost 200 countries on Wednesday, as a “historic package” of measures that offers a “robust plan” to keep the target of capping global temperatures at 1.5°C above pre-industrial levels, within reach.
Although US climate envoy John Kerry said that both the United States and China intend to update their long-term climate strategies, hailing the agreement as one which “sends very strong messages to the world”, the deal doesn’t go so far as to seek a “phase-out” of fossil fuels, for which more than 100 nations had pleaded.
The transition would be structured to align with the goal of achieving net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, in accordance with the principles outlined by climate science.
While acknowledging the need to reduce emissions, Nasser advocates for a pragmatic approach that balances energy security with environmental sustainability.
Nasser’s challenge to the prevailing narrative of fossil fuel phase-out injects a crucial perspective into the ongoing discourse on energy transition and climate action, prompting critical reflection on the viability and implications of abrupt fossil fuel divestment.