In an unexpected admission, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman acknowledged on Friday that his company has been “on the wrong side of history” when it comes to transparency in artificial intelligence (AI).
The statement, made during an Ask Me Anything (AMA) session on Reddit, marked a significant shift in the ongoing debate about whether AI models should be open-source or closely guarded by private companies.
“I personally think we have been on the wrong side of history here and need to figure out a different open-source strategy,” Altman wrote in response to a question about OpenAI’s lack of transparency. However, he noted that “not everyone at OpenAI shares this view, and it’s also not our current highest priority.”
Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 16 (Feb 10 – May 3, 2025) today for early bird discounts.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and co-invest in great global startups.
Register to become a better CEO or Director with Tekedia CEO & Director Program.
Altman’s comments come at a time when OpenAI is under increasing pressure from open-source AI competitors, particularly China’s DeepSeek, whose rapid advancements have rattled Silicon Valley and the global tech industry.
The Rise of DeepSeek: China’s Open-Source Disruptor
DeepSeek, an AI startup founded by a team of former Tencent, Alibaba, and Tsinghua University researchers, made headlines in late 2024 with the release of its R1 chatbot. This model offers performance comparable to OpenAI’s GPT-4 at a fraction of the cost.
But what truly set DeepSeek apart was its open-source approach. Unlike OpenAI, which has moved toward a closed, commercial model, DeepSeek positioned itself as a public-spirited AI initiative that allows developers worldwide to freely access and modify its technology.
DeepSeek’s move was immediately seen as a direct challenge to OpenAI, Google DeepMind, and other Western AI leaders. While OpenAI and Google justify their secrecy as a way to protect intellectual property and prevent AI misuse, DeepSeek has argued that openness fosters greater innovation and trust in AI.
The impact of DeepSeek was felt almost overnight. Within weeks of its release, major AI developers, startups, and universities began experimenting with DeepSeek’s open-source models, reducing their dependence on OpenAI and Google’s proprietary systems.
Even government agencies and corporations in Europe, India, and the Middle East started exploring DeepSeek as an alternative, citing concerns about U.S. tech dominance and data sovereignty.
DeepSeek’s rise sent shockwaves through Silicon Valley. While Meta, Mistral, and some other AI firms have embraced open-source models to varying degrees, the established giants—OpenAI and Google DeepMind—have remained committed to closely guarding their AI breakthroughs.
However, as DeepSeek demonstrated that high-performance AI can be built and shared openly, it forced a broader industry reckoning. Suddenly, OpenAI and Google were no longer the only players in town, and their dominance in the AI space looked more vulnerable than ever.
During his Reddit AMA, a user directly asked Altman whether DeepSeek’s success had changed OpenAI’s plans for its future models.
“It’s a very good model,” Altman admitted, referring to DeepSeek’s technology. “We will produce better models, but we will maintain less of a lead than we did in previous years.”
This was a striking acknowledgment. OpenAI, which once enjoyed an undisputed lead in AI innovation, now faces the reality that competitors are catching up—and fast.
The Battle Between Openness and Secrecy in AI
The debate over open-source vs. closed AI has become one of the most contentious issues in the tech world. Proponents of open-source AI argue that transparency is essential for accountability, security, and global collaboration. They point out that AI models trained in secrecy can be vulnerable to bias, manipulation, and ethical concerns that might go unchecked without public scrutiny.
On the other hand, companies like OpenAI and Google argue that keeping AI proprietary is necessary to prevent misuse and maintain economic incentives for further innovation. OpenAI, in particular, has shifted from its original open-source mission to a for-profit model backed by Microsoft, citing the need to balance safety with commercial success.
Meta, Mistral, and DeepSeek have challenged this view by releasing open models, claiming that AI should be treated like a global utility rather than a corporate product.
Will OpenAI Change Course?
Altman’s statement suggests that internal divisions exist within OpenAI about its future direction. While he appears open to revisiting OpenAI’s approach, he admitted that it is not a top priority for the company at the moment.
This may be because OpenAI is deeply entangled with Microsoft, which has invested billions in the company and integrated OpenAI models into its products like Azure and Copilot. If OpenAI were to shift toward open-source AI, it could risk undermining its business model and straining its relationship with Microsoft.
Meanwhile, DeepSeek and other open-source challengers show no signs of slowing down. Analysts believe that if they continue to gain traction, OpenAI may have no choice but to adapt—or risk losing its leadership position in the AI race.
Meanwhile, OpenAI will be receiving more investment funds from Japan’s SoftBank.
OpenAI may have a new top backer. Japanese investment firm SoftBank is set to invest $40 billion in the artificial intelligence startup, CNBC reports, citing anonymous sources. The deal would value OpenAI at $260 billion and edge out LinkedIn’s parent company, Microsoft, as OpenAI’s largest investor. The cash infusion is expected to provide additional funding for the previously announced Stargate project, a venture by OpenAI, SoftBank and Oracle that aims to build AI computing centers across the U.S.