Home Latest Insights | News Nigeria Needs an Efficient Unemployment Insurance Scheme As The Nature of Work Evolves Globally

Nigeria Needs an Efficient Unemployment Insurance Scheme As The Nature of Work Evolves Globally

Nigeria Needs an Efficient Unemployment Insurance Scheme As The Nature of Work Evolves Globally

I do not know the possibility but we may still have the time before the current session of the Nigerian parliament concludes. Yes, I have posited that Nigeria should have an improved unemployment insurance scheme – “cash benefits payable to individuals with respect to their unemployment” –  where people who lose their jobs can be paid a certain amount for 6 months, after they have worked consistently for a couple of years, and paid into the pool. 

As the painful paralysis of unemployment, arising out of layoffs,  ravages homes and families around the world, we’re learning that losing a job is no more because of lack of competence. Rather, there are many reasons competent, efficient, dutiful and amazing people could be asked to go these days. And if that happens, how can we ensure parents can put food on the table, sons and daughters can afford basic things they need, and indeed, life can go on, untethered wholly on an immediate job.

I am a democrat, and I dream of a time when where we work or the job we hold will not define our status in the society. And if we extrapolate, the job we hold or company we work for or not work, will not drastically affect what it means to be a human. That someone has lost a job must not mean that a person’s life should pause!

Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 16 (Feb 10 – May 3, 2025) opens registrations; register today for early bird discounts.

Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations here.

Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and invest in Africa’s finest startups here.

The United States has a decent system  but Nigeria has none of value. Fascinatingly, I do not think the government should lead this process in Nigeria. I am hoping that we can have an ordinance, enacted by the National Assembly, to enable private companies to offer products with mandatory requirements for companies and workers, regulated by a government agency. Note: this is not pension; this is unemployment insurance.

As we continue to see turbulence in the world of business, we’re entering an age where being out of work, seasonally, will become common – and if that is the norm, Nigeria must have policy tools to help workers recover. The big part: this unemployment insurance payout will be  money the workers have contributed into the pool when they were working, implying that the government is not doing any saraka or giveaway.

Unemployment insurance (UI), also called unemployment benefits, is a type of state-provided insurance that pays money to individuals on a weekly basis when they lose their job and meet certain eligibility requirements.

Those who either voluntarily quit or were fired for a just cause are usually not eligible for UI. In other words, someone separated from their job due to a lack of available work and at no fault of their own usually qualifies for unemployment benefits.

Each state administers its own unemployment insurance program, despite it being federal law. Workers must meet their state’s work and wage requirements, including time worked. The benefits are primarily paid out by state governments and funded by specific payroll taxes collected for that purpose. (Investopedia)

Comment on Feed

Comment 1: Allocating money into the unemployed segment makes a lot of sense and helps the government in many ways.

One it channels money into a low productive segment. Since the unemployed has reduced or no economic activity, little cheques from government can be channeled back into the economy and help spur economy activities.
With increased economic activities, businesses can make more money which can help increase tax collection from government.
Also it helps reduce crime and government spending fighting crime. With regular Cheques from government during unemployment and hardship the tendency to commit crime reduces significantly.
Also, it create a social balance in the society. Keeps family going, reduced chances of separation and children going into the wrong acts.

A well thought out unemployment insurance scheme in Nigeria should be a blessing. However looking at recent social intervention scheme in the country and the corruption that plaqued it we may begin to have a second look.

My Response: “Allocating money into the unemployed segment ” – actually you do not need to allocate money from the government budget. This is like paying for your car insurance where from the pooled premiums, many are settled if bad things happen. A good scheme should not task taxpayers.

Comment 2: Very laudable and badly needed initiative for growing army of our out people that have lost their jobs.
But it can only work devoid of government as every previous government initiatives in this regard have been killed by the corrupt officials.
We may not need to create anything new, we can simply tweak the PENCOM Act to accommodate the need to provide succour to contributors that lost their jobs.

My Response: PENCOM should not handle this because these people are not retiring. As I noted, the government should not drive this but regulate it. Think of your car insurance and premium and how it communally insures everyone (sure, debatable in Nigeria, but it works in many other places). Ideally, if everyone does it, there would be a pool for private companies to make this work under government regulation. But it is not going to be a retirement system.


---

Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA (Feb 10 - May 3, 2025), and join Prof Ndubuisi Ekekwe and our global faculty; click here.

No posts to display

1 THOUGHT ON Nigeria Needs an Efficient Unemployment Insurance Scheme As The Nature of Work Evolves Globally

  1. If the ‘Unemployment Insurance’ money is to come from employees in their employment days, and it’s different from contributory pension, will the active employees still have take home money before waiting for the day of unemployment? Most times we propose some ‘complex impossibility’, but manage to frame it as something to consider.

    People’s take home pay no longer takes them home, and we are proposing saving for unemployment day, what sort of conflicting reality is that? Again, the money contributed, what sort of velocity could it be propelled with, in order to keep it immune from inflation and depreciation? We are technically asking people to surrender more of their already limited freedom to government and institutions, such cannot qualify as a great proposal.

    There are many nuances I wouldn’t want to go into, but if we are looking for what can support people and cushion shocks, why not try to make foods and energy affordable or almost free? Eating food should never be dependent on who has money or is into employment, because it’s never a discretionary activity, rather a mandatory one.

    How can we make basic foods cheaper or almost free? Build food banks and strategic reserves across the land, then reform the NYSC scheme…

Post Comment

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here