In a major boost to Ukraine’s defense capabilities, NATO has signed a contract with a leading European manufacturer to supply high-quality artillery ammunition to the Ukrainian armed forces. The contract, worth 120 million euros, was announced by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg during his visit to Kyiv on January 23, 2024.
The contract is part of NATO’s Enhanced Opportunities Partnership (EOP) with Ukraine, which aims to strengthen the interoperability and resilience of the Ukrainian military in the face of Russian aggression. The EOP also provides Ukraine with access to NATO training, exercises, and intelligence sharing.
NATO’s Enhanced Opportunities Partnership (EOP) with Ukraine is a strategic initiative that aims to deepen the cooperation and interoperability between the Alliance and its partner nation. The EOP was launched in 2014, in response to Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea and its ongoing aggression in eastern Ukraine.
Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 15 (Sept 9 – Dec 7, 2024) has started registrations; register today for early bird discounts.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations here.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and invest in Africa’s finest startups here.
The EOP provides Ukraine with enhanced access to NATO exercises, training, and intelligence sharing, as well as political consultations and practical support. The EOP also recognizes Ukraine’s significant contributions to NATO’s operations and missions, such as in Afghanistan, Kosovo, and Iraq.
The EOP is not a path to NATO membership, nor does it imply any security guarantees from the Alliance. However, it does demonstrate NATO’s strong commitment to supporting Ukraine’s sovereignty, territorial integrity, and Euro-Atlantic aspirations.
The EOP also helps Ukraine to implement key reforms in the defense and security sector, such as strengthening civilian control, enhancing transparency and accountability, and improving interoperability with NATO forces. The EOP is based on mutual interests and shared values, and it respects Ukraine’s right to choose its own security arrangements.
The EOP is one of the most advanced forms of partnership that NATO offers to non-member countries. Only five other nations have been granted this status: Australia, Finland, Georgia, Jordan, and Sweden. The EOP reflects the high level of trust and confidence that exists between
The artillery ammunition contract is the largest single procurement deal under the EOP and will significantly enhance Ukraine’s ability to conduct effective and precise fire support missions. The ammunition, which includes 155 mm and 122 mm shells, is compatible with both NATO and Ukrainian artillery systems, and meets the highest standards of safety and reliability.
The contract also includes a provision for the transfer of technology and know-how from the European manufacturer to a Ukrainian company, which will enable Ukraine to produce its own artillery ammunition in the future. This will create jobs, boost the local economy, and reduce Ukraine’s dependence on foreign suppliers.
Stoltenberg hailed the contract as a concrete example of NATO’s unwavering support for Ukraine’s sovereignty and territorial integrity. He also reiterated NATO’s commitment to help Ukraine implement key reforms in the defense and security sector, such as improving civilian oversight, fighting corruption, and enhancing gender equality.
The contract is expected to be fulfilled by the end of 2025 and will provide Ukraine with enough artillery ammunition to sustain its operational needs for several years. The contract is funded by NATO’s Defense Capacity Building Trust Fund for Ukraine, which was established in 2015 and has received contributions from 18 NATO allies and partners.
US Airstrikes Iranian-backed militia in Iraq
The US military has conducted airstrikes against Iran-backed militia groups in Iraq, according to a statement from the Pentagon. The strikes targeted facilities used by the militia to launch drone attacks against US personnel and interests in the region. The Pentagon said the strikes were defensive and aimed at deterring future attacks.
The strikes were authorized by President Joe Biden, who said he acted to protect US personnel and partners. “We are not seeking to escalate the situation in Iraq or the region,” he said in a statement. “But we will always defend ourselves and our partners when necessary.”
The Pentagon said the strikes hit two locations in Syria and one in Iraq, near the border with Syria. The facilities were used by Kataib Hezbollah and Kataib Sayyid al-Shuhada, two of the most prominent Iran-backed militias operating in Iraq. The Pentagon said the militias have been responsible for several drone attacks against US and coalition forces in Iraq since April.
The strikes were met with condemnation from Iran and its allies, who accused the US of violating Iraq’s sovereignty and escalating tensions in the region. Iran’s foreign ministry spokesman Saeed Khatibzadeh said the US was “following a wrong path” and warned of “the consequences of such illegal acts”. Iraq’s prime minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi said he was “surprised” by the strikes and called for restraint from all parties.
The origins of the US-Iran standoff can be traced back to the 1953 coup d’état that overthrew the democratically elected Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh and restored the monarchy under Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. The coup was orchestrated by the CIA and the British intelligence, who feared that Mosaddegh would nationalize Iran’s oil industry and align with the Soviet Union.
The Shah ruled Iran with an iron fist, suppressing opposition and dissent, and relying on the US for military and economic support. He also embarked on a modernization and westernization program that alienated many traditional and religious sectors of Iranian society.
The Shah’s regime was toppled by the 1979 Islamic Revolution, led by Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, who established an Islamic Republic based on the principle of velayat-e faqih (guardianship of the jurist). The revolution was a watershed moment in Iranian history, as it marked a rejection of foreign interference and a return to Islamic values and identity.
However, it also sparked a hostile reaction from the US, which severed diplomatic ties with Iran and imposed sanctions. The US also supported Iraq in its eight-year war with Iran, which claimed hundreds of thousands of lives on both sides.
The US-Iran standoff entered a new phase in 2002, when President George W. Bush labeled Iran as part of the “axis of evil”, along with Iraq and North Korea. Bush accused Iran of pursuing nuclear weapons and supporting terrorist groups such as Hezbollah and Hamas.
The US also accused Iran of meddling in Iraq and Afghanistan, where the US had invaded and toppled the regimes of Saddam Hussein and the Taliban. Iran denied these allegations and insisted that its nuclear program was peaceful and that its regional activities were legitimate.
The standoff reached a critical point in 2015, when Iran and six world powers (the US, China, Russia, France, Britain, and Germany) signed the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), also known as the Iran nuclear deal.
The deal required Iran to limit its nuclear activities in exchange for relief from sanctions. The deal was hailed as a diplomatic breakthrough that could pave the way for a broader dialogue and cooperation between Iran and the West.
However, it also faced fierce opposition from Israel, Saudi Arabia, and some US lawmakers, who argued that it was too lenient and did not address Iran’s ballistic missile program and its regional role.
The US and Iran have been locked in a standoff over Iran’s nuclear program and its regional influence. The Biden administration has expressed interest in reviving the 2015 nuclear deal that former president Donald Trump withdrew from in 2018, but talks have stalled over mutual demands for compliance.
The US has also accused Iran of supporting proxy groups that attack US interests and allies in the Middle East, while Iran has blamed the US for imposing crippling sanctions and fomenting instability in the region.
The US-Iran standoff is one of the most complex and consequential issues in the world today. It has implications not only for the two countries, but also for the region and the international community. It is a test of diplomacy, leadership, and vision. It is a challenge for peace, justice, and cooperation.