In the vibrant and often tumultuous world of Nigerian politics, the battle for power is waged not only in the polling booths but also in the pages of party manifestos. In this thought-provoking exploration, we embark on a journey into the political economy of party manifestos in Nigeria, using the analytical lens of Marxist theory to decode the intricacies of this crucial aspect of Nigerian democracy.
Class Struggle in Nigerian Politics
To unravel the enigma of party manifestos, we must first grasp the essence of class struggle, a concept famously expounded by Karl Marx. In Nigeria’s political landscape, candidates and their affiliated parties assume the role of capitalists. Their goal? To attain political supremacy through the electoral process, they seek the consent of the electorate during the campaign season. Winning elections grants them the coveted means and governance authority to shape the nation’s destiny.
Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 16 (Feb 10 – May 3, 2025) opens registrations; register today for early bird discounts.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations here.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and invest in Africa’s finest startups here.
On the flip side of this power dynamic are the voters and experts who engage in the vigilant scrutiny of political actors. In this context, they represent the proletarians, the labouring class. They must remain vigilant, discerning the messages propagated during campaigns and the actions of political actors. The experts, in particular, play a pivotal role in identifying inconsistencies and contradictions in these messages, as these can significantly influence voters’ decisions and, in turn, determine electoral outcomes.
Manifestos as Battlegrounds
The heart of election campaigns lies within the pages of party manifestos. Here, candidates engage in a unique form of class struggle, using specific statements to oppose one another on socio-economic and political issues in Nigeria. This battle is often waged through critiques of the ruling political party’s perceived failures in addressing citizens’ needs and improving the nation’s economy.
Aligned with Marx’s theory of labour surplus value, political parties skillfully package existing problems and needs as enticing products for the electorate. Their aim is clear: to secure votes. However, in the context of this study, votes are analogous to a form of labour power exchanged for sound policies and programs that promise to tackle the socioeconomic and political challenges that plague the nation.
The Role of Class Consciousness
Yet, beneath the surface of manifestos lies the critical role of class consciousness. This analytical framework, inspired by Marx, serves as the guiding compass for experts as they navigate the treacherous waters of political ideologies. Class consciousness enables them to identify the underlying narratives and ideologies within manifestos. It also shines a light on how these narratives and ideologies can potentially give rise to false consciousness among voters. In this scenario, vital information remains obscured, adversely affecting their decision-making.
In this reflective journey through the political economy of party manifestos in Nigeria, we have unearthed profound insights. This analysis offers a powerful tool for understanding the complex decision-making process of the electorate during electoral cycles in developing nations like Nigeria.
In a nation where the political landscape constantly evolves, the ability to grasp the deeper socio-economic forces at play becomes an indispensable asset. For both voters and the experts who guide them, this understanding is essential in navigating the intricate terrain of Nigerian politics and shaping the future of the nation.