Japan is facing a serious labour shortage as its population ages and declines. The country needs to find ways to boost its workforce and productivity in order to maintain its economic growth and social stability.
One of the strategies that Japan is pursuing is to invest in technology, especially in fields such as robotics, artificial intelligence, and biotechnology. These technologies can help automate tasks, enhance skills, and create new industries. Another strategy is to open up its borders to more immigrants, who can bring in diverse talents, cultures, and perspectives.
Japan has recently relaxed its immigration policies and introduced new visa categories to attract foreign workers in various sectors. However, both strategies face challenges and limitations. Technology can also displace workers and create ethical dilemmas. Immigration can also cause social friction and cultural clashes. Japan needs to balance the benefits and risks of these strategies and ensure that they are aligned with its values and goals.
Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 16 (Feb 10 – May 3, 2025) opens registrations; register today for early bird discounts.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations here.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and invest in Africa’s finest startups here.
Technology can help Japan overcome some of the challenges posed by the shrinking and ageing workforce. For example, Japan is a world leader in robotics and automation, which can reduce the need for human workers in industries such as manufacturing, agriculture, and health care.
Technology can also enhance the skills and efficiency of the existing workers, by providing them with tools such as artificial intelligence, big data, and cloud computing. Technology can also create new opportunities for innovation and entrepreneurship, which can drive economic growth and competitiveness.
Immigration can also help Japan address its labour shortage, by bringing in more workers from abroad. Japan has traditionally been a closed society, with strict immigration policies and low acceptance of foreigners. However, in recent years, Japan has started to relax its immigration rules and to promote its attractiveness as a destination for foreign workers.
Japan has introduced new visa categories for skilled workers, students, and trainees, and has expanded its refugee program. Immigration can benefit Japan not only by increasing the labour supply, but also by diversifying the culture, enhancing the creativity, and strengthening the ties with other countries.
Japan’s labour crisis is a serious issue that requires urgent action. By betting on technology and immigration, Japan hopes to overcome its demographic challenges and to maintain its economic vitality. These strategies are not without risks or challenges, such as social integration, ethical dilemmas, and security concerns. However, they are necessary steps for Japan to adapt to the changing world and to secure its future.
Public prosecutor ends Nord Stream pipeline sabotage probe in Sweden
After a long and thorough investigation, the Swedish Prosecution Authority has decided to close the preliminary investigation into suspected sabotage against the Nord Stream gas pipeline. This was announced by prosecutor Mats Ljungqvist in a press release on Thursday.
Nord Stream is a gas pipeline that runs from Russia to Germany through the Baltic Sea. It has been the subject of political controversy and criticism from several countries, including the United States, which believe it increases Europe’s dependence on Russian gas and threatens the security and stability of the region.
The Public Prosecutor’s Office opened a preliminary investigation in June 2019 after receiving information that someone had attempted to sabotage the pipeline by placing explosives at its bottom. The investigation has included several countries and authorities, as well as technical and legal analyses.
Prosecutor Mats Ljungqvist says in the press release that it has not been possible to determine who is behind the suspected sabotage, or if it even took place. He also says that there is no reason to assume that there is a connection between the suspected sabotage and the recent tensions between Russia and Ukraine.
“It has been a very complicated and extensive investigation that has required large resources and cooperation with several other countries. We have not been able to find any concrete evidence or traces that point to any perpetrator or motive. Therefore, we have decided to close the preliminary investigation,” says Mats Ljungqvist.
He adds that the decision can be appealed to the Director of Public Prosecutions within three weeks, but that he does not believe that it will lead to any other assessment.
One of the most ambitious and controversial energy projects in Europe is the Nord Stream gas pipeline, which aims to connect Russia and Germany through the Baltic Sea. The pipeline is not yet completed, but it is expected to be finished in 2024, after several delays and challenges.
Once operational, it will have a capacity of 55 billion cubic meters of gas per year, which is equivalent to around 10% of the EU’s gas needs. The Nord Stream project, and how it will affect the European energy market and geopolitics.
Nord Stream 1 was completed in 2011 and has a capacity of 55 billion cubic meters (bcm) per year. Nord Stream 2 was completed in 2021 and has the same capacity, doubling the total annual capacity to 110 bcm. However, Nord Stream 2 has not entered service yet, due to political and regulatory hurdles in Germany and the European Union, as well as opposition from the United States and some Eastern European countries.
The main supporters of the project are Russia and Germany, who see it as a way to enhance their energy security and economic cooperation. Russia wants to diversify its export routes and reduce its dependence on transit countries, especially Ukraine, with whom it has had several disputes over gas prices and volumes in the past. Germany wants to secure its gas supply and reduce its reliance on coal and nuclear power, as well as benefit from lower gas prices and transit fees.
The main opponents of the project are the United States and some Eastern European countries, such as Ukraine, Poland, Lithuania and Latvia. They argue that the project will increase Europe’s dependence on Russian gas and undermine its energy solidarity and diversification. They also fear that the project will weaken Ukraine’s position.