Keeping India's Aadhaar Activism from Nigeria
Quote from Ndubuisi Ekekwe on December 16, 2017, 11:40 AMThe India’s Supreme Court has work to do on the 12-digit Aadhaar number [India’s equivalent of the National Identity Number, in Nigeria) with its recent ruling. The Aadhaar number is a number that is tied to a user’s biometric information, and is mandatory for various welfare programs and services in India. The government of India has used the Aadhaar number to deepen national security [at least know the citizens] and reduce corruption in the distribution of welfare services to the poor.
But that is not the end of the story: critics are fighting, saying that the Aadhaar number infringes on the privacy of the users especially the poor. That this fight has gone to the Supreme Court tells you the power of activism. I am not against privacy but there are things in life which common sense should drive. The poorest Indians are cheated daily on grains: government pays, but the poor never sees the items because of corruption. Now, government seems to have figured out a better way of helping them, through the use of Aadhaar, only for some people to talk privacy.
I am hoping that Nigerian activists will not get the memo and take the National Identity Management Commission (NIMC) to court. Every technology has a drawback but in nearly everything in life, one has to look at the cost- to-benefit ratio to ascertain the value. Knowing your citizens is a national strength and there is no way that can be done without the citizens losing some elements of privacy. There needs to be a balance, and activists should understand that nations function with structures. Even Facebook will not allow you to join its continent, if you do not declare to allow the Sovereign Government of Facebook to have access to your personal data.
The India’s Supreme Court has work to do on the 12-digit Aadhaar number [India’s equivalent of the National Identity Number, in Nigeria) with its recent ruling. The Aadhaar number is a number that is tied to a user’s biometric information, and is mandatory for various welfare programs and services in India. The government of India has used the Aadhaar number to deepen national security [at least know the citizens] and reduce corruption in the distribution of welfare services to the poor.
But that is not the end of the story: critics are fighting, saying that the Aadhaar number infringes on the privacy of the users especially the poor. That this fight has gone to the Supreme Court tells you the power of activism. I am not against privacy but there are things in life which common sense should drive. The poorest Indians are cheated daily on grains: government pays, but the poor never sees the items because of corruption. Now, government seems to have figured out a better way of helping them, through the use of Aadhaar, only for some people to talk privacy.
I am hoping that Nigerian activists will not get the memo and take the National Identity Management Commission (NIMC) to court. Every technology has a drawback but in nearly everything in life, one has to look at the cost- to-benefit ratio to ascertain the value. Knowing your citizens is a national strength and there is no way that can be done without the citizens losing some elements of privacy. There needs to be a balance, and activists should understand that nations function with structures. Even Facebook will not allow you to join its continent, if you do not declare to allow the Sovereign Government of Facebook to have access to your personal data.
Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 16 (Feb 10 – May 3, 2025) opens registrations; register today for early bird discounts.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations here.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and invest in Africa’s finest startups here.
Quote from Francis Oguaju on December 16, 2017, 1:01 PMActivism was cut from the same cloth as unionism, so the activists and unionists are always 'fighting' for one cause or the other. But we have to be clear on one thing: nobody actually fights for another person if there's no intrinsic or extrinsic benefit the 'fighter' stands to gain either directly or indirectly. This thing called privacy is only an illusion, or at best an imagination. Obviously you cannot be on the web or internet and still scream privacy all the time. I can guarantee you that the poor do not have any problem with the measures government has taken, but raising such point to an activist is more or less like chasing the wind. Anyway the friends of the poor are not the people who fill the airwaves and courtrooms telling us that they are 'fighting for the poor', if you think they are, then you haven't been a full citizen of the world for a considerable time. Somebody will always tell you why your best efforts are wrong or immoral, it's left for you to pay attention to the rantings or do the needful. World of wonders!
Activism was cut from the same cloth as unionism, so the activists and unionists are always 'fighting' for one cause or the other. But we have to be clear on one thing: nobody actually fights for another person if there's no intrinsic or extrinsic benefit the 'fighter' stands to gain either directly or indirectly. This thing called privacy is only an illusion, or at best an imagination. Obviously you cannot be on the web or internet and still scream privacy all the time. I can guarantee you that the poor do not have any problem with the measures government has taken, but raising such point to an activist is more or less like chasing the wind. Anyway the friends of the poor are not the people who fill the airwaves and courtrooms telling us that they are 'fighting for the poor', if you think they are, then you haven't been a full citizen of the world for a considerable time. Somebody will always tell you why your best efforts are wrong or immoral, it's left for you to pay attention to the rantings or do the needful. World of wonders!