Antitrust Brews on Amazon
Quote from Ndubuisi Ekekwe on May 27, 2021, 3:07 PMAmazon faces antitrust high voltage searchlight over its pricing policies, LinkedIn reports: "In an attempt to end Amazon's alleged unfair use of price agreements to squash competition, Washington, D.C., Attorney General Karl Racine is suing the company. The antitrust suit declares that the e-commerce giant's practices "suppressed innovation" by preventing third-party sellers from selling their wares for lower prices on other platforms and asks the court to intervene via means of ordering "structural relief," also known as a break-up. Amazon's pricing policies have been the subject of previous scrutiny, while both Google and Facebook have been involved in recent antitrust lawsuits."
Amazon faces antitrust high voltage searchlight over its pricing policies, LinkedIn reports: "In an attempt to end Amazon's alleged unfair use of price agreements to squash competition, Washington, D.C., Attorney General Karl Racine is suing the company. The antitrust suit declares that the e-commerce giant's practices "suppressed innovation" by preventing third-party sellers from selling their wares for lower prices on other platforms and asks the court to intervene via means of ordering "structural relief," also known as a break-up. Amazon's pricing policies have been the subject of previous scrutiny, while both Google and Facebook have been involved in recent antitrust lawsuits."
Quote from Emmanuel Awopetu on May 27, 2021, 3:16 PMHaha! What were you expecting, this is business not charity, and the ultimate goal is monopoly- I doubt IAS has reach that end, so shared prosperity is still a thought.
In 2018, when we had a discussion on Transsion Holding, I wrote, "Once you dominate the market ensure the table revolves around you". The end is to capture the most value, and please don't blame Amazon for doing that.
They would scale through this, Bezos, is wise enough not to be distracted by all this court orders.
Good evening prof.
Haha! What were you expecting, this is business not charity, and the ultimate goal is monopoly- I doubt IAS has reach that end, so shared prosperity is still a thought.
In 2018, when we had a discussion on Transsion Holding, I wrote, "Once you dominate the market ensure the table revolves around you". The end is to capture the most value, and please don't blame Amazon for doing that.
Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 16 (Feb 10 – May 3, 2025) opens registrations; register today for early bird discounts.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations here.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and invest in Africa’s finest startups here.
They would scale through this, Bezos, is wise enough not to be distracted by all this court orders.
Good evening prof.
Quote from Faleti Ayodele on May 27, 2021, 4:32 PMIs history not going to repeat itself?
Remember the Supreme Court ruling in 1911 that dismantled Standard Oil of John D. Rockefeller for violation of federal antitrust law.
Google, Facebook and now Amazon facing antitrust investigation.
Is history not going to repeat itself?
Remember the Supreme Court ruling in 1911 that dismantled Standard Oil of John D. Rockefeller for violation of federal antitrust law.
Google, Facebook and now Amazon facing antitrust investigation.
Quote from Ndubuisi Ekekwe on May 27, 2021, 7:21 PMWe will see if they will break digital America and hand the world over to Chinese players.
We will see if they will break digital America and hand the world over to Chinese players.
Quote from Faleti Ayodele on May 28, 2021, 2:24 AMLol
Lol
Quote from Emmanuel Awopetu on June 26, 2021, 4:13 AMOn this, I believe it good they reference history, recalling that antitrust done badly would only breed inefficient companies. Since many would see it as a means t0 safe guard competitors than promote competition.
In the end the goal of antitrust policies is to make firm become more efficient and not relax not to promote bias, encouraging detrimental favoritism.
Anti trust done well is the lifting of the nation for the satisfaction of the customers. Breaking down of big firm would only spell doom to the economy not just only about Chinese taking over.
On this, I believe it good they reference history, recalling that antitrust done badly would only breed inefficient companies. Since many would see it as a means t0 safe guard competitors than promote competition.
In the end the goal of antitrust policies is to make firm become more efficient and not relax not to promote bias, encouraging detrimental favoritism.
Anti trust done well is the lifting of the nation for the satisfaction of the customers. Breaking down of big firm would only spell doom to the economy not just only about Chinese taking over.