California Governor Gavin Newsom has vowed to revive the state’s Clean Vehicle Rebate Program (CVRP) if President-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration dismantles federal tax credits for electric vehicles (EVs).
The announcement underscores a clash between California’s climate action priorities and the potential policy shifts of Trump’s second term.
“We will intervene if the Trump Administration eliminates the federal tax credit, doubling down on our commitment to clean air and green jobs in California,” Newsom stated. “We’re not turning back on a clean transportation future — we’re going to make it more affordable for people to drive vehicles that don’t pollute.”
Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 16 (Feb 10 – May 3, 2025) opens registrations; register today for early bird discounts.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations here.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and invest in Africa’s finest startups here.
The CVRP, which had provided financial incentives for over 590,000 vehicles before being phased out in late 2023, will be reinstated to cushion California residents from potential changes to the federal electric vehicle tax credits.
These credits, introduced under President Joe Biden’s Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) in 2022, allow buyers of qualifying EVs to receive up to $7,500 in tax rebates. The program catalyzed EV adoption nationwide, benefiting automakers like Ford, General Motors, Rivian, and Tesla.
However, with Trump set to assume office, his administration, in coordination with Congress, could significantly alter or remove these rebates. Speculated changes include lowering the rebate amounts, introducing stricter eligibility criteria, or implementing market-share limitations, which could exclude dominant players like Tesla from benefitting.
Tesla’s Market Dominance And The Rebate
Tesla’s dominance in the EV market, particularly in California, has placed it at the center of the rebate debate. The company accounted for nearly 55% of new EV registrations in California during the first three quarters of 2024, according to the California New Car Dealers Association. While Tesla’s overall sales grew, its market share declined from 64% in 2023 to 55% in 2024, as competitors like Hyundai and BMW made modest gains.
Newsom’s office suggested that California’s revamped rebate program may include a market-share cap to promote competition and prevent one company from monopolizing state incentives. Such a cap could exclude Tesla and other major players from receiving rebates, redirecting funds toward newer or smaller EV makers.
Elon Musk, Tesla’s CEO, quickly criticized the potential exclusion on X (formerly Twitter), calling it “insane.” Musk’s reaction has sparked accusations of hypocrisy, as he has publicly supported the end of federal tax credits, arguing that Tesla’s strong market position renders the company less dependent on government incentives.
“I think it would be devastating for our competitors and for Tesla slightly,” Musk said during a July earnings call. “But long term probably actually helps Tesla, would be my guess.”
Musk’s comments highlight a paradox: while he advocates for eliminating federal subsidies to disadvantage competitors, he opposes California’s exclusion of Tesla from state rebates, a move designed to achieve a similar competitive balance. Many have suggested Musk wants to “eat his cake and have it.”
The potential rollback of federal credits and California’s response come at a critical time for the EV industry. Governor Newsom’s decision to revive the CVRP aligns with California’s broader climate goals and reflects the state’s resistance to Trump-era policies that could undermine clean energy progress.
This isn’t the first time California has clashed with Trump on environmental issues. During his first term, the state sued the administration over 100 times, challenging policies on greenhouse gas emissions, health care, and immigration.
Dan Ives, an analyst at Wedbush Securities, warned that the evolving rebate policies could lead to a “Game of Thrones-style battle” between Newsom and Musk. Such tensions may prompt Tesla to accelerate its exit strategy from California, a process that began when Musk relocated Tesla’s headquarters to Texas in 2021.
California remains the largest EV market in the United States and a global leader in clean transportation. Despite Tesla’s dominance, the state has seen increasing competition, with Hyundai and BMW capturing 5.6% and 5% of the EV market, respectively, in 2024.
Reinstating the CVRP could mitigate the impact of federal policy changes and make EVs more accessible to Californians. However, the introduction of market-share limitations may deter Tesla’s participation, potentially impacting the state’s EV adoption rates and overall competitiveness.
Musk’s apparent alignment with Trump on ending federal tax credits raises questions about Tesla’s long-term strategy. Musk is set to co-lead Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), an advisory commission tasked with reducing federal spending. Analysts speculate that Musk’s support for ending subsidies is aimed at solidifying Tesla’s dominance by slowing the growth of competitors reliant on such incentives.