The cryptocurrency landscape is witnessing a significant legal battle that could set precedents for the future of digital assets and their regulation. Binance, one of the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges, and its CEO, Changpeng Zhao (commonly known as CZ), have been embroiled in a lawsuit with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The crux of the matter lies in the SEC’s allegations of securities violations concerning certain cryptocurrencies.
In a recent development, the legal team representing Binance and CZ has filed a motion to dismiss the SEC’s amended complaint. This move comes as a response to the SEC’s latest lawsuit update, which targets additional tokens such as Axie Infinity Shards (AXS), among others. The amended complaint also includes tokens like Filecoin (FIL), Cosmos’ ATOM (ATOM), The Sandbox’s SAND (SAND), and Decentraland’s MANA (MANA).
The SEC alleges that Binance operated as an unregistered national securities exchange, which is a violation of the federal securities laws. This includes the offer and sale of crypto assets that the SEC considers securities. Binance is accused of misrepresenting the trading controls and oversight on the Binance.US platform, suggesting that there were more robust systems in place than actually existed.
Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 16 (Feb 10 – May 3, 2025) opens registrations; register today for early bird discounts.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations here.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and invest in Africa’s finest startups here.
The SEC’s complaint includes allegations of manipulative trading that artificially inflated the platform’s trading volume. It is alleged that Binance and CZ diverted customer assets to entities they controlled, including Sigma Chain and Merit Peak Limited, without proper disclosure to customers. The SEC claims that while Binance publicly stated that U.S. customers were restricted from transacting on Binance.com, the platform secretly allowed high-value U.S. customers to continue trading.
The motion to dismiss, filed on November 4, 2024, argues that the SEC’s claims, “fail as a matter of law” and should be dismissed with prejudice and without leave to amend. The defense team contends that the court had previously rejected the SEC’s attempt to conflate crypto assets with investment contracts, recognizing that while crypto assets can be sold as part of an investment contract, each transaction must independently satisfy securities laws.
Binance’s legal team has criticized the SEC for what they describe as a lack of clarity on regulation when it comes to virtual assets. They argue that secondary market resales of the assets long after they were first distributed by their developers are not ‘securities’ transactions. This argument is pivotal, as it challenges the SEC’s stance that almost all transactions involving crypto assets are securities transactions because some buyers might expect the assets to increase in value.
The SEC alleges that Binance.US was presented as an independent platform for U.S. investors, but in reality, it was controlled by Binance and CZ behind the scenes. These allegations, if proven true, could have significant implications for Binance and the broader cryptocurrency market. The outcome of this legal battle is being closely watched as it may influence the regulatory landscape for digital assets in the future.
The outcome of this motion and the broader lawsuit could have far-reaching implications for the cryptocurrency industry. If Binance’s motion to dismiss is granted, it could signal a shift in how crypto assets are treated under securities law and potentially provide a clearer regulatory framework for the industry. Conversely, if the motion is denied, it could affirm the SEC’s approach to regulating cryptocurrencies and possibly lead to stricter oversight.