The appointment of David Sacks as the “White House AI and Crypto Czar” by President-elect Donald Trump is seen as a significant move towards a more crypto-friendly regulatory environment in the U.S. “I am pleased to announce that David O. Sacks will be the “White House A.I. & Crypto Czar.”
Sacks is expected to work on creating a legal framework that provides clarity for the crypto industry, which has been a long-standing demand from the sector. “He will work on a legal framework so the Crypto industry has the clarity it has been asking for and can thrive in the U.S. David will also lead the Presidential Council of Advisors for Science and Technology…” Trump wrote.
This appointment, along with the nomination of Paul Atkins, a known crypto advocate, to lead the SEC, signals a shift towards more supportive policies for cryptocurrencies. The aim is to make the U.S. a leader in both AI and crypto technologies, ensuring that these industries can thrive with clear and favorable regulations.
Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 16 (Feb 10 – May 3, 2025) opens registrations; register today for early bird discounts.
Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations here.
Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and invest in Africa’s finest startups here.
Atkins’ appointment is seen as a significant shift from the previous SEC Chair, Gary Gensler, whose tenure was marked by stringent enforcement actions against crypto firms. Trump’s decision to appoint Atkins aligns with his campaign promise to make the U.S. a leader in the cryptocurrency space.
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse congratulated David Sacks on the appointment. Garlinhouse said, “He understands tech inside and out, and importantly, will push forward President Trump’s crypto and AI pro-innovation plans.”
Stuart Alderoty thinks Sacks is another great pick by the Trump administration. Paul Atkins’ nomination as SEC Chairman to replace Gary Gensler by Trump sparked a massive bullish sentiment in the crypto industry. Alderoty said it will bring the “pro-business, pro-innovation, and fresh perspective we need.”
For those unaware, Trump had vowed to reshape the regulatory landscape, and had already proposed a larger oversight role for the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC). While early speculation hinted at Chris Giancarlo, the former CFTC chair, for the Crypto Czar position, Trump’s shift to Sacks reflects a fresh approach to integrating innovation and regulation.
Gary Gensler’s tenure as the SEC Chair was indeed marked by significant controversy within the crypto community. Many in the industry felt that his approach to regulation stifled innovation. Gensler’s strategy, often described as “regulation by enforcement,” involved numerous lawsuits and enforcement actions against crypto firms.
This approach led to accusations of overreach and created a climate of uncertainty, driving some American digital asset firms to seek friendlier regulatory environments offshore. Gensler’s stance was that most cryptocurrencies should be regulated as securities, which many in the industry argued was an outdated perspective.
His tenure saw significant pushback from crypto advocates and industry leaders who felt that his policies were more about control than fostering innovation. Atkins, who previously served as an SEC commissioner from 2002 to 2008, is expected to bring a more industry-friendly and accommodating approach to the regulation of cryptocurrencies.
Former CFTC Chairman Chris Giancarlo and pro-XRP lawyers strongly claim that the Ripple vs SEC lawsuit appeal will likely get dropped or dismissed. Trump’s pro-crypto team, including Paul Atkins and David Sacks, has increased the odds of lawsuit resolution.
Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse has expressed his support for Atkins, calling him an “outstanding choice” to lead the watchdog. Meanwhile, speculation over whether the U.S. SEC will continue its legal battle or allow the deadline to pass as the January 15 deadline approaches.
With the recent changes in the SEC leadership, there is hope within the crypto community for a more balanced and supportive regulatory framework. What do you think about these developments?