Home Latest Insights | News A Regional-Based Model Could Accelerate Nigeria’s Development

A Regional-Based Model Could Accelerate Nigeria’s Development

A Regional-Based Model Could Accelerate Nigeria’s Development

A Senator wrote concluding with the word “brilliant”. Yes,  this post  is making impacts and it seems many Nigerians agree with the core thesis. And not just Nigerians, many Africans agree that we have a huge problem on tribal identity which affects allegiance to the nations. If Iceland with a population of less than 400k people could have autonomy, and still participate in the market system at the continental level due to how Europe has structured its political economy, African countries languishing on ethnicism have a model to examine.

Yes, it is really possible that a centralized government we run in Nigeria may not be optimal. And the state-level model is so microcosmic that most states have no capacity to do impactful things. But at a regional level, if banded together, more could be accomplished. Of course, no matter how regional you go, the demon of corruption must still be fixed!

In 2021, I wrote: “The economic structure of North Central Nigeria is totally different from South South Nigeria – and most times, there is no variance on our policy playbooks. A balanced, nuanced policy framework which is regionally incubated and delivered by the states would be more pragmatic in the nation. Today, that economic heterogeneity is not well captured within our policy instruments. That explains why we have many challenges.

Tekedia Mini-MBA edition 16 (Feb 10 – May 3, 2025) opens registrations; register today for early bird discounts.

Tekedia AI in Business Masterclass opens registrations here.

Join Tekedia Capital Syndicate and invest in Africa’s finest startups here.

“Historically, Nigeria developed faster under a regional-based model. There is a reason for that: policies were more laser-focused on the needs of the regions, and consequently were more impactful.”

Good People, in business, if you have the wrong business model, no matter how hard working you may be, you will FAIL. I will not extend that hypothesis to political economy, but I do think that a political economic restructuring may be catalytic in Nigeria and broad Africa.

(My feed is a classroom; we share ideas here. Do not see them as agenda-based. I am a free-wheeling person who gets liberation when I write.)

Comment on Feed

Comment 1: Nice going Prof… Ndubuisi . I think it is important to retrace the building blocks of Iceland’s success in Europe, since you have used it concurrently as a case in point…

In the global collapse of 2008, The US started bailing out its banks on the failure of its sub-prime market. Many European banks had exposure to US toxic assets.
US bullied European Govts. to pressure them in doing the same with their banks.
Because of this, there was a huge global recession. Big wigs across Europe had money in Icelandic banks, and tried to bully Iceland to do the same.
Iceland, a nation as you rightly said, only 400k people, stood up to the European ‘super-core’ (at that time, the UK, France and Germany) and said no!

What followed later, showed that Icelands decision, and refusal to bow to pressure, deemed it to have acted on the right side of posterity.

So if you indeed want such an example in Africa, then look for that rare species of nation which will pursue its own vision when 53 other nations are trying to bully it into the submission representing the opposite direction.

Such nation will be your Iceland of Africa.

My Response: “So if you indeed want such an example in Africa, then look for that rare species of nation which will pursue its own vision when 53 other nations are trying to bully it into the submission representing the opposite direction.” – that is the opportunity we are asking for here. There are many nations which can do that within Nigeria. The homogenous education policy of Nigeria at the basic level makes no sense since Imo State may have a literary rate of 96% when Yobe may be at 15%. And the agric policy fails because Jigawa can be more advanced by 70%points than Abia on mechanization.  Someone will remind me that states can fix these things. Not really because they’re not autonomous at a deeper level. Unlike Iceland, none has the capacity to make its choices because everything is centralized.


---

Register for Tekedia Mini-MBA (Feb 10 - May 3, 2025), and join Prof Ndubuisi Ekekwe and our global faculty; click here.

No posts to display

Post Comment

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here